We may dream about the cosmos and take a new hypothesy becouse
there are only hypothesies about the birth and death of universe.
We have more knowledge about the development of universe becouse
the astronomers, cosmologists and other scientists invented a lot of things
and they invent nowadays too. We know to reveal the development "easier"
becouse we live in this phase and we search the feature of substance
by hard work. I think about the physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy,
and so on. And I think about the mathematics which helps the other
sciences by its special lenguage. But we don't fergot the different
phylosophies becouse we can't say any safe about them. Ther are two
phylosophies which conflict each others about the creating or
not creating of universe.

     This is a short description about my idea respect the life of cosmos.
I try to solve - maybe only for me - thouse problems which couse
trouble for those people who interested in these things.
I consider this description an entertainig phantasy not a science.
Maybe it occurs that these idea bored in brains of some other people
becouse I don't know exactly the newest theories about these problems.

     I specify thouse things in this paragraph whish are affect this
subject. This is not an important order becouse all of these
things are important, it would be hard to give an important order.
1.  Had been the universe created or not?
2.  Isn't the universe endless or not?
3.  Where disappeared the bulk of mass?
4.  What are the role of black holes in life of the universe?
5.  What statements are in a black hole?
6.  How many time would be the life of universe?
7.  How we explain the extension and contraction of the universe?
8.  Where was the substance before the explosion, if it was anyway?
9.  How we explain the fundamental laws considering the birth of universe?
10. What is the role of black holes in the life of galaxies?
11. How happens the "birth" and "death" of cosmos?
12. How we explain the space and time?
There are many other questions which suit this subject.
I tried to specify thouse questions what I'd like to deal with.

     Many people tried to solve this problems creating hypothesies.
I try to search an idea for these or parts of these at least.
Ceartainly I can't to find a resolution all of these questions.
For example here is the first question which is too hard for me.
I think this is the belief of people and maybe we will never get
answer to that.

     After this introduction I start to write my idea. I think that
the birth and death of universe is a cyclical process. There was an
explosion and after that there was the development of the universe.
This led to a statement which occured an additional explosion and
the cycle started again. I imagine this process depends on black holes
According to me the substance (energy) was in a black hole before the
explosion, the substance was closed there in space and time. Nobody knows
what was the attribute of substance that time but I think the whole
material world was there with its mass, energy, pulsemomemtum, and so on.
Certainly there was else statement there which is get used to us in our
world. I think that statement wasn't stable. Something event inside
led to an explosion. Consequently the material world was present at the
explosion, only it expanded in space and time. There was no creation
becouse all of thing was there which was necessary for our world.

     In this idea the creation would be there that how the substance issued
at the first time in the serial of the cycles. You may say if you are
a materialist that there wasn't origin cycle becouse the serial of
cycles beginless and endless. But if you are a godly people you may say
that there was the creation at the first time, the substance was created 
and the laws of substance was given and the first cycle was started.
I read such idea which detours both of these theories and it
evoles all thing form nothing to something and from the something to the
present world eliminated the creation. I consider this theory a forced
idea and I can't establish it. Anyway I won't deal with these theories
so I like to write about a cycle and the serial of cycles.

     I start to describe a cycle from a premise of cycle which is a
black hole I think. In this black hole the substance is given with its
features but true its form is unknown for us. This is not a stable
statement so it become instable due to the inside statements. This may be
similar like the event of the radioactive carbon isotopes, we can't know
when but we know it will occur the breaking of an isotope. This event a
gigantic explosion what we name "the big bang". At this occasion the
substance releases from the gravitation and opens in the space-time.
The directions, the distances and the processes which happen in time
will be reason.

     First the processes are rapid, later they will be slower.
The substance become a simplyfied form in the world of atoms. This is
the Hydrogen which serves the fusion fuel of stars. Concourses arise,
the stars become light and the galaxies are organized. I won't write that
how arised the heavier elements becouse the astronomers wrote this well.
I'd like to write a little more about the black holes becouse they get
a great role in the process in my idea.

     The gravitation arises the black hole like the stars and galaxies
as well. The different is in case of black hole that so much substances
gather in a part of space that the force of gravitation will be so great
on its surface that the rapidity of escape exceeds the light-speed.
An external observer can't observe that becouse the light unable to
escape from it so it become invisible. Obviously if the light unable to
escape the black hole any else unable too. But its force of gravitation
proceeds out of it. The black holes operate like gigantic hoovers.
They suck the materies which go too close to them. We define this
environment of black hole by the event horizon. If a thing go inside
the event horizon it unable to escape from that so it fell on the black
hole and it become an unknown form of substance. They said the black hole
is a singularity what practically denotes me that we can say about it nothing.
The black holes are knew by us by events which happen in thouse
environments outside the event horizon.
These are:
- if any substance orbits around an invisible point with great velocity
  then it emits X-rays and gamma rays which may measured or
- a visible substance orbits around an invisible point with great velocity or 
- mattery-flows are observed form a visible star to an invisible point or
- the influence of gravitation lens may couse that we see a star in duplex.
Likelyhood this invisible things are black holes which have huge mass.
The substance doesn't consummate in them and I think it holds its features
in any formation. I think that the substance has similar structure in
level of sub-atom like the gens are in the living world. It seems to me
that the substance inherits earlier structures. For example the structures
of the atoms are similar to the cosmical structures. Certainly there are
many difference besides. Maybe the gens of the living world are inherited
by "elementary codes" of the substance from a deeper level.
Maybe there are something similar codes of the substance in a black hole
like the features of a plant in its seed. The "sleeping" substance
in a black hole waits for an inside or outside circumstances to deploy by
an explosion and to give life for a newer cosmos.
There is such theory that the black holes are considered like windows
which are opened to another universe. This is an interested idea but I won't
go to this direction. If it would be right then the substance would flow
via the black hole to the other world. But it would must be the contrary
process that the substance would flow into our world from the black hole
of the other world. I don't know such observation which would confirm that
the substance flow into our universe apparently form the "naught".
If it would be such fenomenon it would must be any indication about it.
Maybe such consideration led some people who stated that there are white
holes which are opposite the black holes and there are the combination of
the both ones. But there aren't any proof about them so I don't think them
while any indirect proof arise about them. These theory was bored becouse
some physical features couldn't explain considered only the black holes.
Anyway the white hole - opposite the black hole - spit all things out of it.

     We know that there are black holes in our cosmos and I think
the cycles don't follow each others in a serial order but there are
coverage among them. I think there are black holes in the centre
of the galaxies. The force of gravitation of the black hole and the stars
integrate the galaxy. The central black hole couses the death of galaxy
in time to come becouse it sucks all stars and else interstellar substances.
The spiral-shape of galaxy seems like an eddy which is arised by the central
black hole where the mass of galaxy flow into it. That's true this shape may
arised else way too. Certainly there are young galaxies which haven't
black holes in their center but I think they will be there in time.

     I imagine that the origin of black holes is lawlike becouse the
influence of gravitation. Galaxies of black holes may arise if there
will be enough black holes.  If we carry on this idea we may get such
reason that endly only one black hole arise which denotes the total death
of our world. But I said earlier this wouldn't be eternal becouse the
the newer explosion goes, the wink of birth, and all start ahead in a new cycle.
But I think this is too regular, I imagine it's more complicated.

     It's the question that all things of the universe must enclouse in a
black hole to occur an explosion. Not sure, maybe it occurs before all of
things fell into sole black hole. In this case at the occasion of explosion
high elements would stay here what would generates a faster development.
Greater chance would be to develope a civilisation. We would imagine that
the cycles cover each others or we would imagine too that an explosion occurs
in a part of cosmos unless the other part of the cosmos would destroy.

     The bulk of total mass of cosmos (at about 70-80%) is hidden for us.
Several cosmologists state that this dark mass are present in some kind of
elementary particles. But they didn't find these particles.
Maybe the bulk of this hidden mass flew into black holes before or possibly
a part of this mass didn't relese at the explosion. If we think that
the total mass was in a black hole and we consider that the flow is
moderate then we may get that conclusion that the bulk of mass flew into
black holes since the explosion was (at about 15 billion years). So 2-3
billion years remained. But if we consider that I have written before an
explosion may occur tomorrow at all. If such an explosion would be closed
to us would couse so catastrophe what would kill the life likelihood.
But if it would be enough far away us we would survive it perhaps.
I think here cosmic distances and cosmic time.
There is a disturb fact about the age of cosmos. There was such observing
which resulted that the cosmos yunger then 13-14 billion years.
Otherwise the astronomers observed such objectums which elder than the
above age. These two observings reason an absurd conclusion that there
are so objectums which are elder than their birth if we remain the only
one explosion. My idea resolutes this problem becouse I said it would be
an explosion in our cosmos too and would be survival of this catastrophe.
I notice here that catastrophe more dangerous what the little orbits or
the comets would cause to the living world of Earth becouse these are in our
neighbourhood while the black holes are cosmic distances and time from us.
And I no mentioned the human activities (environmental catastrophe, atomwar,
dangerous gen-manipulations).

     It would help or deny such theory if we would know more about what
situations are in a black hole. This is a wery hard task becouse the
black hole invisible and it emits nothing so we unable to get any
information from its inside. It's sure to me that the substance which
flew into a black hole don't consummate what its great gravitation
signs for us. If it's true then the inside substance must held its feature
any way. I think here the general laws of mattery. For example it would
be imagine that the pulsemomentum of fallen mattery added to the inside
pulsemomentum. Of what would be instable a black hole is hard to tell.
Maybe the great centrifugaly force gets over the huge gravity force.
Or above a critical mass - similarly the atombomb - start a chainreaction
which couse an explosion. Or like at event of the radioactive carbon
isotope the explosion will be incidental. But it would occur if two
gigant mass of black holes hit into each others coused a cosmic catastrophe
in its environment.
Today such theory exists too that the lightspeed not a constant value.
It was higher in the earlier cosmos than it is in present time.
Some astronomy observations verifies this theory. If it would be true
than it would give explanations to some things, for example to the arising
of expansion becouse the change of lightspeed arised the expansion.
Before the big bang the vacuum-energy decreased becouse the lightspeed
decreased too and the escaped energy translated to the mass of cosmos
meanwhile it was the big bang. Certainly there is a question, what coused
the changing of lightspeed in the pre-cosmical "vacuum". Anyway the theory of
vacuum-energy stands for the cosmological constant of Einstein.
This theory would give an explanations to the fine-tuning of the cosmos
but it would chang the present physics, it contradicts the theory of
relativity, the law of energy-conservation, and so on becouse these theories
and else physical laws need the constant lightspeed.
The above theory gives another explanation to the arising of expansion.
All of these are venture indeed. Maybe any else thing explodes the black hole.

     It's the question that it would be such event in a black hole which
takes the black hole instable. While we can't say more about inside of
black hole this remains belief for us. It would be very overcast to me
that all of things fell into a black hole and remain there forever.
It's rather nice to me that we live together the death of a part of the
cosmos but it may birth again by an explosion. This world will consume
like the living consume too but else births instead. The world which was
born from a black hole contains its death why not contains its birth
at all. So I trust that the black hole will explode in time to come.

     I overwiev the points before to finish this idea and I try to
answer to that in short sentences.
1.  Determine all people that the world was created or not according to
    their belief. I can't determine betwen these opposite idea.
    I think that the materialists need belief in this case only they
    believe in else.
2.  My idea don't give a concrete answer that the uiverse endless or not.
    Maybe other cosmos are "elsewhere" where their life is similar to
    our cosmos.
3.  The invisible mattery are in the black holes.
4.  I wrote about the black holes so I won't write about them here.
5.  We have only guess about the substance in the black hole.
    It's sure it very different what we use in the physics.
6.  The age of universe is neutral, maybe it is continuous besides
    the partial death and birth.
7.  I establish that there was an explosion due to an instable statement
    of the black hole or two black holes collapsed each others meanwhile
    the growing condition was present too. According to me the extension
    and collapse are in time togeather. Meanwhile the whole world extends 
    the parts of cosmos collaped to the black holes.
8.  I think the substance was present before the explosion.
    We don't tell what kind of formation was there but the substance
    contained all what are necessary to the life of cosmos.
9.  The fundamental laws remain in this idea. These behalf on the substance.
    When substance escapes from the black hole they operate naturally.
10. The galaxies produce the black holes in time what couse the death of
    galaxies later.
11. The death of world not a lasting event but there is a mixture of
    birth and death. The parts of cosmos disappear in black holes
    but they appear by the explosion again.
    I notice here when I mention death then I don't think about consummation
    I think isn't the nothing in the black hole but there are gigantic
    mass in it. But I think the life in a black hole is unlikely due to
    the contrasted statements.
12. I think the black hole is a gravity prison of substance and a prison
    of the space-time at all. If the substance is encloused to a black
    hole the inherent space-time is encloused too. But at the explosion
    the space-time appear again.

     Summarized I configure the next theory:
Pass over we the origin becouse that arise such problems what go beyond
my idea. Emphasize we from the process a cycle for example the our cycle.
We know there are such space objects in which the substance are in
extreme form. These are the black holes. Huge mass are in the black holes.
We hardly know something about the inside circumstances. Probably the
gigantic pressure collapses the atoms and perhaps the elementary particles
too. I think this isn't an eternal statement. I have two idea about it. 
Both this statement become instable due to the inside relationship and 
the inside relationship unable to change the statement.
If I consider the first event then may occur an explosion what burst up
the black hole. But may occur an explosion in the second event too when
two black hole hit each others. Incredible to me that it would be a
"plain" collapse particularly if two black holes collide which have huge
mass. At the explosion the substance escape from the gravity pressure and
the substance starts to go back to the present form. Consequently an
explosion may occur in present time. Obviously it does huge destroyment in
our cosmos but not sure to destroys all. Heavier elements survive it which
may generate faster development in the new cosmos.
According to I said the substance present in our cosmos in two forms.
One form which is familiar to us and the other form is in the black holes.
But at least the same substance present both place as well. At the explosion
the known features and laws of the substance prevail again.
Even the II. law of thermodynamics would be valid becouse the explosion
creates a new order in a part of the cosmos. So the thermical equalisation
never will become considered to the serial of explosions.
My idea stands closer to the Steady State theory what denies the
beginning of time. But I accept the "singularity" what is a black hole.
It's true that the singularity of Big Bang is different from the
singularity of black hole. I think the Big Bang is true for a part of
the cosmos and becose duplex physical laws can't control the same cosmos
the explosion doesn't create another kind of world what is was in which
the explosion happened. The essential laws of physics will remain
what was before. So it necessary the matter saves its properties in any
kind of formations in the black hole. I think the density of the black
hole is not infinit. Likely the density of black hole is greater as the
density of a neutron star but it is not infinit. It denotes me the extent
of the black hole is not dotlike. So it has pulsemomentum what is showed
by its accretion disk and the jets. May imagine that the axle of black
hole suits to the jets. This denotes too that the Laws of Physics wouldn't
break down in the black hole - as we expect in a singularity - but it has
great gravity what denotes the conservation of mass prevails.
This doesn't imagine without law of conservation of matter.
All these denotes me that the white hole and the wormhole don't exist,
and unable to travel to the past or to a great distance accross a wormhole.
That part of the cosmos which we live evolved by an explosion of a black
hole which happened cca. 15 billion years before now. I think it's a
philosophical problem that the whole cosmos had a beginning or there is a
transcendent being who created the world.

     I would write the next analogy to give an other aspect for my idea:
Suggest we our cosmos to a bloomy bush. The twigs of the bush which keep
togeather the bush stand for the gravitation which keep togeather the
cosmos. The blooms match to the galaxies and the seeds generated from the
blooms match to the black holes. The leaves match to the interstellar
substances like the mists and dustclouds. From the "ejected seeds" - from
the black holes - arise new cosmos at event "occasion". Consequently the
explosion similar to the budness. The growing of the bush symbolises the
extension of the cosmos. This extension is compensated by the flow to the
black holes and the elderness occures when too many parts of the cosmos
disappear in the black holes. The seed involves that codes which confirm
to generate a similar plant. I think the substance involves mean sort of
codes which confirm to genetrate similar cosmos. The new cosmos or a part
of cosmos holds down (destroys) the old one but its substance doesn't
consummates, it builds in the new cosmos. This "bush" stand the soil of
space-time and its "roots" lead to the original problems of the phylosophy.
I notice here that I think the evolution concerns to the livingless mattery
too. What else would we consider that process when the mattery developes
from a simple formation (Hydrogen) to heavier elemets or from the atomic
formations to the cosmic formations and so on.
This analogy signs that I not believe in the total death but I believe in
the regeneration.

     In conclusion I based this idea to the black holes becouse amongst
the presently known space objects they seem to me proper to solve the
questions above. Certainly some wishes have been written here which not
scientical so you consider this idea a phantasy-game.

Ps: If you interested in more about the black holes, please click here.

Nagy Sándor
Debrecen, July. 2000.


         
  Nasa       Homepage